The person at the center of this case
Bjorn Daniel Sundin (fugitive defendant)
Justice for Bjorn Daniel Sundin (fugitive defendant) — the trail went cold in 2010, but the truth hasn't.
Start here
Why has Sundin evaded capture for over 15 years despite the FBI wanted notice and international coordination?
What specific banking records and money trails link Sundin to the laundered proceeds in European accounts?
What is the current status and cooperation level of co-conspirator Shaileshkumar P. Jain in the investigation?
Bjorn Daniel Sundin is wanted for his role in a massive international cybercrime scheme that defrauded over one million internet users across 60+ countries between 2006 and 2008, causing losses exceeding $100 million through fake antivirus software scams. Operating through the company Innovative Marketing, Inc., Sundin and his co-conspirators used deceptive pop-up ads and fake malware warnings to trick victims into purchasing worthless "scareware" software, with proceeds laundered through bank accounts worldwide. Despite being indicted in Chicago in May 2010, Sundin remains at large with known ties to Sweden and Ukraine, and a $20,000 reward is offered for information leading to his capture.
Try asking
A one-time $10 claim transfers this imported case workspace to your account. You get 10 uploads for this case, 25 daily AI questions for this case, and public tips with files route to you.
This does not start a subscription. When the included limits are reached, the Personal plan unlocks more workspace capacity.
Beyond the top three above — each detail below could be the thread that pulls this case open.
Are there known safe houses or associates in Sweden or Ukraine that may be harboring Sundin?
How many victims have come forward since 2010, and are there patterns in victim complaints that could aid in locating the fugitive?
Even the smallest detail could be the key to solving this case.
Official wording
Wire Fraud; Conspiracy to Commit Computer Fraud; Computer Fraud Caution: Bjorn Daniel Sundin, along with his co-conspirator, Shaileshkumar P. Jain , is wanted for his alleged involvement in an international cybercrime scheme that caused internet users in more than 60 countries to purchase more than one million bogus software products, resulting in consumer loss of more than $100 million.
It is alleged that from December 2006 to October 2008, through fake advertisements placed on legitimate companies’ websites, Sundin and his accomplices deceived internet users into believing that their computers were infected with “malware” or had other critical errors in order to encourage them to purchase “scareware” software products that had limited or no ability to remedy the purported defects. Sundin and his co-conspirators allegedly deceived victims, through browser hijacking, multiple fraudulent scans and false error messages, into purchasing full paid versions of software products offered by their company, Innovative Marketing, Inc.
The proceeds of these credit card sales were allegedly deposited into bank accounts controlled by the defendant and others around the world, and were then transferred to bank accounts located in Europe. When customers complained that their purchases were actually fraudulent software, call center representatives were allegedly instructed to lie or provide refunds in order to prevent fraud reports to law enforcement or credit companies.
On May 26, 2010, Sundin was indicted in Chicago, Illinois, by a federal grand jury for the United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois. He was indicted for wire fraud, conspiracy to commit computer fraud and computer fraud.
That same day, a federal warrant was issued for Sundin’s arrest. Remarks: Sundin has ties to Sweden and the Ukraine.
Fraudulent scareware operation begins in December 2006
Scareware operation ends in October 2008
Bjorn Daniel Sundin indicted in Chicago, Illinois by federal grand jury for wire fraud, conspiracy to commit computer fraud, and computer fraud
For information leading to the resolution of this case
For information leading to the resolution of this case