The person at the center of this case
Internet users worldwide (over 1 million victims)
Justice for Internet users worldwide (over 1 million victims) — the trail went cold in 2010, but the truth hasn't.
Start here
Where is Jain currently located? His known ties to Brazil, Canada, India, and Ukraine suggest possible international hiding locations.
What financial records and bank accounts in Europe received the fraudulent proceeds? Tracing these transfers could reveal co-conspirators.
Who is Bjorn Daniel Sundin and what is his current status? Understanding the co-conspirator network is critical.
Shaileshkumar P. Jain is wanted for his role in a massive international cybercrime scheme that defrauded over one million internet users across 60+ countries of more than $100 million between 2006 and 2008. Through fake malware warnings and deceptive scareware software sales, Jain and his conspirators tricked victims into purchasing fraudulent products while operating the company Innovative Marketing, Inc. Despite being indicted in Chicago in May 2010, Jain remains at large with known ties to Brazil, Canada, India, and Ukraine.
Try asking
A one-time $10 claim transfers this imported case workspace to your account. You get 10 uploads for this case, 25 daily AI questions for this case, and public tips with files route to you.
This does not start a subscription. When the included limits are reached, the Personal plan unlocks more workspace capacity.
Beyond the top three above — each detail below could be the thread that pulls this case open.
How did Innovative Marketing, Inc. operate its call centers and what infrastructure supported the scheme across 60+ countries?
What information do victims and credit card companies have about transaction patterns that could help locate Jain?
Even the smallest detail could be the key to solving this case.
Official wording
Wire Fraud; Conspiracy to Commit Computer Fraud; Computer Fraud Caution: Shaileshkumar P. Jain, along with his co-conspirator, Bjorn Daniel Sundin , is wanted for his alleged involvement in an international cybercrime scheme that caused internet users in more than 60 countries to purchase more than one million bogus software products, resulting in consumer loss of more than $100 million.
It is alleged that from December 2006 to October 2008, through fake advertisements placed on legitimate companies’ websites, Jain and his accomplices deceived internet users into believing that their computers were infected with “malware” or had other critical errors in order to encourage them to purchase “scareware” software products that had limited or no ability to remedy the purported defects. Jain and his co-conspirators allegedly deceived victims, through browser hijacking, multiple fraudulent scans and false error messages, into purchasing full paid versions of software products offered by their company, Innovative Marketing, Inc.
The proceeds of these credit card sales were allegedly deposited into bank accounts controlled by the defendant and others around the world, and were then transferred to bank accounts located in Europe. When customers complained that their purchases were actually fraudulent software, call center representatives were allegedly instructed to lie or provide refunds in order to prevent fraud reports to law enforcement or credit companies.
On May 26, 2010, Jain was indicted in Chicago, Illinois, by a federal grand jury for the United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois. He was indicted for wire fraud, conspiracy to commit computer fraud and computer fraud.
That same day, a federal warrant was issued for Jain’s arrest. Remarks: Jain is a United States citizen who has ties to Brazil, Canada, India and the Ukraine.
Fraudulent malware warning scheme allegedly begins through fake advertisements on legitimate websites
International cybercrime operation allegedly ends in October 2008
Shaileshkumar P. Jain indicted in Chicago by federal grand jury for wire fraud, conspiracy to commit computer fraud, and computer fraud
Warrant for arrest issued same day as indictment
For information leading to the resolution of this case
For information leading to the resolution of this case